Hi all,
I've heard that posts with original photos are generally more successful than articles with stock photos. But I generally batch all my photo production and editing in one sitting.
So far, I've been writing a number of articles and waiting to publish them until I perfect the photos.
My rationale is that if I publish without photos, Google may decide to rank me lower because I lack photos.
I'm concerned that if I later return to the article and add photos, Google may not "notice" because I missed the window of when they first noticed that post on my site.
At the same time, I've heard it can take months or years for a post to rank on Google, so it's better to publish sooner than later so you can start that timer.
What do you guys think?
Thanks in advance.
Submitted June 16, 2020 at 02:07PM by Leraine3 https://www.reddit.com/r/Blogging/comments/hag191/is_it_better_to_publish_a_post_once_writing_is/?utm_source=ifttt






No comments: